Welcome guest!    Login or Register

Wal-Mart Cuts Food Storage Bag Brands

SHARE: Email to a ColleagueEmail Print This ArticlePrint Share on LinkedInLinkedIn Share on FacebookFacebook Share on TwitterTwitter

February 9, 2010

walmart store frontWal-Mart reportedly banished Glad and Hefty bags from the food-storage category, leaving only one national brand, SC Johnson’s Ziploc, and its own Great Value store brand on the shelves.

Industry observers anticipate Wal-Mart will similarly consolidate other categories and reduce product assortment over the next several months “often to the benefit of its fast-expanding Great Value brand and national brands that survive the vetting,” according to an Ad Age Report.

Meanwhile Pactiv Corp., Hefty’s parent, has agreed to manufacture all of Great Value’s food storage and trash bag products that were previously produced by smaller unbranded manufacturers.

Despite the consolidation in food storage bags, both Glad and Hefty trash bags retained shelf position, although Hefty’s assortment was reduced to just its CinchSak line.

Wal-Mart’s food-storage brand consolidation followed a series of in-store tests that began last year, “which appear to have prompted the Glad, Hefty and Ziploc brands to hike ad spending dramatically, despite a deep recession and flat to falling category sales, in efforts to stave off de-listings,” the Ad Age report said. “The contests had high stakes for the brands, given that Wal-Mart makes up a third or more of their sales.”

Store brand food storage bag sales were up 7.9 percent across food, drug and mass channels (including Wal-Mart) during the 52 weeks ending Dec. 26, 2009, compared to the prior year, according to Nielsen data reported in Supermarket News. Meanwhile, national brand sales fell 5.4 percent.

Wal-Mart’s aggressive steps are not surprising to some industry observers since the food storage and trash bag categories have some of the largest store brand penetration rate, “with more than a third of dollar sales and more than half of volume in the combined categories coming from store brands in measured channels,” according to the Ad Age report.

"If you look at the trash-bag category, you really have to ask yourself, 'Is there really a need to have more than one brand and private label?' I think Wal-Mart is going to make similar moves in some of the cleaning areas and then across the portfolio," Consumer Edge Research analyst Bill Pecoriello told Ad Age.

SBD Views: This Battle of the Bags shouldn’t surprise anyone. Walmart’s classification of all product categories into Win, Play or Show categories as part of Project Impact is affecting suppliers across the store as the role of store brands in each category is being redefined. I do, however,  find two things interesting in the outcome of this particular battle. First, the national brands that lost out were substantial brands that spent tens of millions of dollars in consumer advertising to be “the last bag standing.” The failure of this strategy to maintain shelf space puts national brands on notice that even massive consumer ad budgets won’t save them from being de-listed (what will CPG brand managers do if they can no longer spend their way onto the shelf?) Secondly, Hefty’s parent company Pactiv received a substantial consolation prize with the contract to manufacture Great Value plastic bags. This move provides support for my comment in previous SBD Views that Walmart’s growing appetite for store brand manufacturing capacity will be partially satiated by national brand suppliers that don’t make the cut. Watch for more national suppliers to exit Walmart as national brands, and re-enter  under Great Value, the world’s largest CPG brand. –– John Failla for Store Brands Decisions.

 

Comments (5) - Post a Comment
Also, if there is no national brand then the whole PL value story disappears. Just like, if everyone is "green" then no one is green. Not to say that William isn't on to something too. This economy is driving many "sea changes" in retail and elsewhere that I think we are just starting to see....
Fredrick at 10:35am EST - February 15, 2010
cont'd...ompanies such as P
Peter Poole at 7:36pm EST - February 12, 2010
Wal-Mart will never eliminate brands. Not only is it not possible for them to do so but it is also counter-productive. Historically, the manufacturers of branded goods have been the power behind the investment in innovation, category development and advertising that brings consumers to the aisle where the products are sold. To a large degree, Wal-Mart needs such companies to highlight the benefits of the category and its brands otherwise the consumer may well not visit the category whilst in-store. Or, if the consumer does visit the category the news may not be 'front of mind' and so they miss whatever it is. As companies like Loblaws in Canada and Tesco in the UK build highly respectable and competitive private label products the heat will be on the branded manufacturers to identify their next competitive advantage or route-to-consumer. One option is to circle back on global production economies and start manufacturing more localised versions of their brands. After all, this is exactly what is giving companies like Loblaws and Tesco a competitive advantage. They know what Canadians and Brits respectively like and arrange for manufacture of these localised products. The margins they forgoe on third-party manufacturing of lower volumes are compensated by the fact that they "own" the remaining margin thanks to their ownership of the stores. An alternative for branded manufacturers may be the on-line marketplace but unless the brands own that channel then that will not be of any value. Companies such as P
Peter Poole at 7:35pm EST - February 12, 2010
From a bottom line profit perspective, I wonder how the financials change for Pactiv. Is there a benefit to being the lead horse in the PL supplier race vs. being an also ran in the national brand race?
John at 8:13pm EST - February 9, 2010
More specifically, I believe it was presented to Pactiv as, "Your brand will no longer be carried at Walmart. If you want to retain any business with us, you will supply your own proprietary product in our own private label". Look for the new GV bags to be identical to the Hefty product in appearance and quality. If this happens, it would be a true landmark in non-food private label.
William at 6:42pm EST - February 9, 2010


Post A Comment


Name: (*Required)
Email: (*Required)
- Not Displayed With Comment
Website:
Comment:
 

« View All Articles